It is currently Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:54 am


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Wildlife dilemma: Protect killer whales or the fish they eat
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 6:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:53 pm
Posts: 700
WASHINGTON — When it comes to dinner, Puget Sound's killer whales show no respect for international boundaries.

It's long been known that their favorite meal is Chinook salmon. However, using new genetic tests on the orcas' feces, and fish tissue and scales taken from the waters near where the whales are feasting, scientists say that as much as 90 percent of the Chinook they eat are from Canada's Fraser River.

Though the dietary habits of killer whales may not seem like a big deal, the orcas and various salmon species are protected on both sides of the border. Efforts to revive endangered species that share the same ecosystem can become intertwined.

"It is fascinating the whales specialize in a particular species, and the species they focus on is one of the rarer ones and in some case protected," said Michael Ford, the director of the conservation biology division at the National Marine Fisheries Science Center in Seattle. "Recovery of the whales could be dependent on the recovery of salmon. It is all related."

Ford was among a group of U.S. and Canadian scientists who published the results of their study in the recent edition of the journal Endangered Species Research.

The problem of killer whales nibbling on declining salmon runs isn't just an international one. Federal scientists say that Puget Sound killer whales may also be taking their toll on endangered salmon from California.

Though their numbers fluctuate, about 90 killer whales make up the southern resident population that swims the inland waters of Washington state and British Columbia from south Puget Sound to the Strait of Georgia. From late spring to early fall, the whales stay in the inland waters. During the winter they're known to roam the Pacific Ocean from northern California to Vancouver Island.

The whales weigh between 6,000 and 12,000 pounds and can eat up to 300 pounds of fish a day.

From 2004 to 2008, scientists from both countries followed the orcas in small boats near the San Juan Islands in Washington state and the western Strait of Juan de Fuca in British Columbia.

"You could see them eating fish, a predator chasing their prey under our boat," Ford said.

As the orcas were feeding, the scientists used swimming pool nets to collect fish scales, fish tissue and whale feces floating in the water.

"It's not high tech," said Brad Hanson, a wildlife biologist with the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle and another of the study's authors.

Whale feces can range from the size of a quarter to a piece that covers the bottom of the net. Hanson said the scientists mostly relied on DNA from the fish scales and tissue.

Beginning in 2006, scientists have been building a DNA database for West Coast salmon that now includes 20,000 samples. While they can't identify the particular stream a salmon comes from, they're able to identify a particular watershed.

"It's an extremely reliable tool," Hanson said.

Confirming previous studies, the scientists found that Chinook, a relatively scarce species, topped the list of the orca's favored prey. Using the DNA samples, however, they discovered that 80 percent to 90 percent of the Chinook in the samples came from the Fraser River, and only 6 percent to 14 percent came from Puget Sound Chinook stocks.

No is quite sure why the orcas seemed hooked on Chinook, particularly those from the Fraser River, Hanson said.

It could be because they're relatively abundant during the summer months compared with other salmon species. Others have suggested the killer whales favor Chinook because they're larger — averaging roughly 20 pounds — and contain more fat than other salmon species. Fraser River Chinook are generally larger than those in Puget Sound, Hanson said.

"The bigger they are, the more bang for the buck," he said.

Nine populations of Chinook found in the range of the killer whales are listed as either endangered or threatened. On the Fraser River, some returning runs of Chinook were at record low levels in 2009, and Canadian fisheries officials are predicting "very low" returns of summer Chinook this year as a result of poor ocean survival rates.

"The research findings have implications for how Canadians manage their Fraser River stocks," said Brian Gorman, a spokesman for the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle.

Hanson said some of the scientists he works with want to get breath samples from the orcas, which could provide information on what chemicals the whales have been exposed to and whether they're healthy. The idea is to pass a piece of sample material, attached to a pole, though the plume exhaled through a whale's blowhole when it breathes.

"It's a challenge," he said.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/03/16/9 ... z0iONKYmTv


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wildlife dilemma: Protect killer whales or the fish they eat
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 12:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:35 am
Posts: 223
Moisture Missile wrote:
... On the Fraser River, some returning runs of Chinook were at record low levels in 2009, and Canadian fisheries officials are predicting "very low" returns of summer Chinook this year as a result of poor ocean survival rates.

"The research findings have implications for how Canadians manage their Fraser River stocks,"

"It's a challenge," he said.


The REAL challenge here is for someone (anyone?) in DFO to recognize that the same old line "poor ocean survival rates" simply doesn't cut it in light of increasingly large and recovering runs both to the South and North of BC. The problem here is "management" itself - more-so than any other factor. Then again for any of the upper echelon to admit to that would result in immediate dismissal under the current dictorial regime. Guess we're likely stuck with the old shell game they so much like to employ... :oops:

On the other hand, the discovery that the Fraser stocks of springs are instrumental to orca survival may actually put some pressure on The Dino to do something real in terms of management. What a refreshing thought! :twisted:

Nog


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wildlife dilemma: Protect killer whales or the fish they eat
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 165
X2

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wildlife dilemma: Protect killer whales or the fish they eat
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:13 am
Posts: 127
Location: Nanaimo
X3

_________________
Too much water, too little time.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO
All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]